Braden Gage (Class Reading)
After reading the geo aesthetics conference paper, one part that really stood out to me was when the author talked about following footprints in the desert and realized that they didn't always lead the right way. At first, it seemed like a good idea to follow where other people had walked, but it turned out that some of those paths were wrong, and it actually made things more confusing. I think this connects to environmental thinking because it shows how relying on what others have done in the past isn't always the best approach, especially when dealing with nature and changing conditions. The wind even erased the footprints later, which kind of symbolized how those paths aren't permanent or reliable. It made me think about how people often look for easy answers or just follow what's already been done, instead of paying attention to their surroundings and experiences.
Comments
Post a Comment